ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB vs Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-09-06 06:20:06, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:38:12
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is 171.7mm long, 78.5mm wide, and 9.7mm thick. It weighs 215.0g.
The design of Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" is 144.9mm long, 71.9mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 26.7mm in length, 6.5mm in width, and 1.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" is more compact than "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 70g. The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 54/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 9/100 | 57/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 54/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.
Display of the Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.65inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB". The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 81/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 86/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 40MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 14MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 11GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" than the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB". The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3060.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1940mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 98/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 91/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB
The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB
The "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" or "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.65inch makes the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB", the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 42/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 57/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB" and "Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s 256GB | Infinix Smart (2017) 16GB | |
Color | Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black | Champagne gold/Sandstone Black/Bordeaux red/Mysterious blue/Apple Green |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.5mm x 171.7mm x 9.7mm | 71.9mm x 144.9mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 215.0g | 145.0g |
Display size | 6.65inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 387ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 3060.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | Mediatek MT6580 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |