Which one is better, the ZTE Hawkeye 32GB or TECNO Spark 3 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2019-09-14 05:50:29, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:27:24
Which do we recommend after comparing the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" or "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
The design of TECNO Spark 3 16GB
The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" is 155.3mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 8.2mm thick.
The design of ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is 154.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 1.3mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. Both the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB". Both the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 62/100 | 62/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | - | - |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
Display of the TECNO Spark 3 16GB
The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1500, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB". The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
Camera performance of TECNO Spark 3 16GB
The main camera of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
The processing capability of the TECNO Spark 3 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB", the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB". The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" than the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB". The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 74/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 37/100 | 76/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
Battery performance of TECNO Spark 3 16GB
The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" is a bit better.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | - |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 95/100 | - |
Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
The storage capacity of the TECNO Spark 3 16GB
The "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Hawkeye 32GB
The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" or "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" or "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB"?
If you want a larger screen, "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" and "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" overall, "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | - | - |
Display | 66/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 54/100 | 85/100 |
General rating | 71/100 | 78/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the TECNO Spark 3 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Hawkeye 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "TECNO Spark 3 16GB" and "ZTE Hawkeye 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
TECNO Spark 3 16GB | ZTE Hawkeye 32GB | |
Color | Midnight Black/Champagne Gold/Aqua Blue/Bordeaux Red | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.8mm x 155.3mm x 8.2mm | 76.0mm x 154.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | ||
Display size | 6.2inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1500 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 | Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |