Compare vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB vs Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
Created date: 2019-09-17 05:04:52, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:03:08
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB".
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |||
General rating: | 78.9/100 (The 3065th of all smartphones) | 73.2/100 (The 1023th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 45/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 79/100 | 87/100 | ||
Performance | 99/100 | 91/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 91/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 70/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
The design of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is 167.4mm long, 76.1mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 218.5g.
The design of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is 147.7mm long, 68.7mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 19.7mm in length, 7.3mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is more compact than "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 55.5g. The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 72/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 7/100 | 44/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
Display of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2256, and the pixel density is 363ppi. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a 6.89inch screen size.
Display of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2960, and the pixel density is 567ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a 5.8inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.08inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 83/100 | 74/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 88/100 | 76/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
Camera performance of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 52MP difference in comparison. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
The processing capability of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" uses the Exynos 9810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 8GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" equally. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" than the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 94/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 89/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
Battery performance of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 91/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is recommended as it has a 5.8inch screen. "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 45/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 79/100 | 87/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 91/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 81/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
Color | Black/Blue | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.1mm x 167.4mm x 9.4mm | 68.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 218.5g | 163.0g |
Display size | 6.89inch | 5.8inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2256 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 363ppi | 567ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | Exynos 9810 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |