Vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB vs. alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-09-17 06:22:32, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:28:42
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The design of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is 167.4mm long, 76.1mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 218.5g.
The design of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is 146.1mm long, 71.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 145.7g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 21.3mm in length, 4.1mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is bigger than "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is more compact than "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 72.8g. The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 7/100 | 56/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Display of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2256, and the pixel density is 363ppi. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a 6.89inch screen size.
Display of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.68inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 83/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 88/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 56MP difference in comparison. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 14MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ SoC. The CPU performance is 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6738 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB", the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB". The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" than the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 33/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" over the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB
The "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" or "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.89inch makes the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB", the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 45/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 79/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 49/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB" and "alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo NEX 3 5G 256GB | alcatel Pulsemix (2017) 16GB | |
Color | Black/Blue | Metal Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.1mm x 167.4mm x 9.4mm | 71.9mm x 146.1mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 218.5g | 145.7g |
Display size | 6.89inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2256 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 363ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | Mediatek MT6738 |
CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |