A comparive review of the differences between the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB and Coolpad Cool 5 64GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2019-10-03 03:51:02, Updated date: 2020-04-15 19:40:07
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB".
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |||
General rating: | 65.4/100 (The 3570th of all smartphones) | 57/100 (The 2218th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 59/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 66/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 93/100 | 68/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 84/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
The design of Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is 157.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.
The design of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is 147.5mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 153.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 9.5mm in length, 5mm in width, and 0.2mm in thickness. "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is bigger than "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 8g. "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" weighs less than "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" and is easier to handle.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 62/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 57/100 | 50/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
Display of the Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 270ppi. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has a 6.22inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.01inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
Camera performance of Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
The processing capability of the Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB", the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB". Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" than the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 96/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 90/100 | 54/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
Battery performance of Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2705.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1295mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" over the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Cool 5 64GB
The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is recommended over "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 82/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". If you want a larger screen, "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.2inch screen. The "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" overall, "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 59/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 66/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 93/100 | 68/100 |
General rating | 80/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Cool 5 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Cool 5 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Coolpad Cool 5 64GB | ZTE Axon 7 mini 32GB | |
Color | Gradient Blue/Midnight Blue | Ion Gold/Platinum Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.0mm x 157.0mm x 8.0mm | 71.0mm x 147.5mm x 7.8mm |
Weight | 145.0g | 153.0g |
Display size | 6.22inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1520 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 270ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2705.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |