Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB vs LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-10-27 14:55:21, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:25:15

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GBLG K20 plus (2016) 32GB
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GBLG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB".

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GBLG K20 plus (2016) 32GB
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

General rating:

75.4/100

(The 3243th of all smartphones)

49/100

(The 1537th of all smartphones)

Grip
51/100
61/100
Screen quality
80/100
60/100
Performance
98/100
48/100
Storage size
90/100
78/100
Battery
100/100
83/100
Rear-camera resolution
70/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

The design of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is 159.5mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 8.1mm thick. It weighs 198.5g.

The design of LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" is 148.6mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 58.5g. The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand20/10061/100
Ease of carrying around59/10060/100

Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

Display of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a 6.38inch screen size.

Display of the LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 277ppi. The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.08inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10071/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

The main camera of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?70/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM855 Snapdragon 855 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.

The processing capability of the LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB", the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB". The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" than the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games97/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.

Battery performance of LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" over the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10083/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10067/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

The "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 90/100

Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" or "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" or "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.38inch makes the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB", the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB

LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB

Handling51/10061/100
Display80/10060/100
CPU specs98/10048/100
General rating82/10064/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "LG K20 plus (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GBLG K20 plus (2016) 32GB
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GBLG K20 plus (2016) 32GB
ColorPurple/Aurora White/BlackBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.2mm x 159.5mm x 8.1mm75.2mm x 148.6mm x 7.9mm
Weight198.5g140.0g
Display size6.38inch5.3inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2340720 x 1280
Pixel density403ppi277ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh2700.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM855 Snapdragon 855Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB2.0GB
Storage size256.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles