A comparive review of the differences between the ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB and vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2019-10-27 14:55:36, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:25:30
How are the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" or "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
The design of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is 159.5mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 8.1mm thick. It weighs 198.5g.
The design of ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
The "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 185.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3.5mm in length, 1.7mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB". Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 13.5g. "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" weighs less than "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and is easier to handle.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 58/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 20/100 | 29/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
Display of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a 6.38inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
The "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.87inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
Camera performance of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
The processing capability of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM855 Snapdragon 855 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB", the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" equally. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" than the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB". Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 76/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
Battery performance of vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
The "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3140.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1360mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" slightly more. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 93/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 84/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB
The "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" or "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" or "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB". If you want a larger screen, "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.38inch screen. The "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" overall, "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 51/100 | 50/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 85/100 |
General rating | 82/100 | 74/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB" and "ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo iQOO Neo 855 256GB | ZTE Blade V8 Pro 32GB | |
Color | Purple/Aurora White/Black | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.2mm x 159.5mm x 8.1mm | 77.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm |
Weight | 198.5g | 185.0g |
Display size | 6.38inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 3140.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM855 Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |