Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB vs. vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2019-10-28 20:08:31, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:40:27

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBvivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBvivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBvivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.7
33/100
rating-image3.1
62/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image4.2
83/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.8
76/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

The design of Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is 158.5mm long, 80.7mm wide, and 14.2mm thick. It weighs 256.0g.

The design of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 146.5mm long, 73.3mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 148.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 12mm in length, 7.4mm in width, and 6.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 108g. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand43/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10055/100
Ease of carrying around48/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

Display of the Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 575ppi. The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has a 5.1inch screen size.

Display of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.1inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". Both the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?69/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?65/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

The main camera of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 1MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?70/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" uses the Exynos 9810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB". Both the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet90/10080/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games74/10058/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.

Battery performance of vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1900mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". Both the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" or "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 768GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is recommended over "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos96/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" or "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" or "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.1inch screen. The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Handling33/10062/100
Display81/10074/100
CPU specs83/10069/100
General rating74/10070/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GB" and "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBvivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Galaxy Xcover FieldPro 32GBvivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
ColorBlackWhite+Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)80.7mm x 158.5mm x 14.2mm73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm
Weight256.0g148.0g
Display size5.1inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 25601080 x 1920
Pixel density575ppi423ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 9810Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801
CPU specs2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles