Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo Y3 Standard 64GB vs Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2019-11-06 19:49:44, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:37:13

vivo Y3 Standard 64GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 Standard 64GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB".

vivo Y3 Standard 64GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.5
49/100
rating-image2.3
45/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image3.8
75/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Storage sizerating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image5.0
99/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The design of vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is 159.4mm long, 76.7mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 191.5g.

The design of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 200.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2.2mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 8.5g. "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" weighs less than "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" and is easier to handle.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand59/10053/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand25/10019/100
Ease of carrying around57/10054/100

Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Display of the vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1544, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a 6.35inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.34inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB". The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?78/10076/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?82/10078/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

The main camera of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" equally. Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet83/10082/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games67/10066/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" may be slightly better. Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10099/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10094/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" or "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10090/100

Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" or "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" or "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". If you want a larger screen, "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 6.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GB

Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB

Handling49/10045/100
Display67/10074/100
CPU specs75/10074/100
General rating75/10073/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y3 Standard 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y3 Standard 64GB" and "Galaxy A9 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo Y3 Standard 64GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 Standard 64GBGalaxy A9 (2016) 32GB
ColorInk blue/Jade RedPearl White/Midnight Black/Champagne Gold/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.4mm
Weight191.5g200.0g
Display size6.35inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15441080 x 1920
Pixel density268ppi367ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles