Vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) vs Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-11-06 13:54:48, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:10:19
How are the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
The design of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is 159.4mm long, 76.7mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 190.0g.
The design of Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
The "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" is 150.8mm long, 76.2mm wide, and 11.1mm thick. It weighs 206.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 8.5mm in length, 0.5mm in width, and 2.1mm in thickness. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 16g. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 55/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 26/100 | 15/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 55/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
Display of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1544, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a 6.35inch screen size.
Display of the Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
The "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.14inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" nor the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 78/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 82/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The main camera of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
The main camera of the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" uses the Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB", the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has more memory storage, making the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is the better choice to buy over the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)". The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" than the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 91/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 85/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
The "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB
The "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 272GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is recommended as it has a 6.35inch screen. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB", the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is overall the clear winner.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 49/100 | 45/100 |
Display | 67/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 89/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 61/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB), compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | Energizer Energy E520 LTE 16GB | |
Color | Ink blue/Jade Red | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm | 76.2mm x 150.8mm x 11.1mm |
Weight | 190.0g | 206.0g |
Display size | 6.35inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1544 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek MT6737 |
CPU specs | 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |