Vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) vs. HTC U Play (2017) 64GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2019-11-06 14:02:51, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:18:22
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB".
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 63/100 (The 3638th of all smartphones) | 59.8/100 (The 319th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 49/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen quality | 67/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 89/100 | 82/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 83/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 100/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The design of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is 159.4mm long, 76.7mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 190.0g.
The design of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is 146.0mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 145.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 13.4mm in length, 3.7mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is bigger than "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 45g. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 26/100 | 57/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Display of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1544, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a 6.35inch screen size.
Display of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" uses a Super LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.14inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)". The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 78/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 82/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Camera performance of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The main camera of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The main camera of the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The processing capability of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" uses the Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" edges out the competition. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" as it has better performance. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 91/100 | 86/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 85/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
Battery performance of vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" over the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 83/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)
The "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB
The "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 91/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" or "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.2inch screen. "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 49/100 | 63/100 |
Display | 67/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 89/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 77/100 | 78/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB), compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HTC U Play (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB)" and "HTC U Play (2017) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo Y3 (4GB+64GB) | HTC U Play (2017) 64GB | |
Color | Ink blue/Jade Red | Brilliant Black/Cosmetic Pink/Ice White/Sapphire Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm | 72.9mm x 146.0mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 190.0g | 145.0g |
Display size | 6.35inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1544 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 268ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 |
CPU specs | 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.0GHz+1.1GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 16.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |