Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB vs Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2019-11-06 14:29:14, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:16:43

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 (2019) 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

General rating:

65.7/100

(The 3559th of all smartphones)

63.2/100

(The 1195th of all smartphones)

Grip
49/100
42/100
Screen quality
67/100
74/100
Performance
96/100
82/100
Storage size
90/100
78/100
Battery
100/100
100/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
80/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The design of vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is 159.4mm long, 76.7mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 190.5g.

The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2.2mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is bigger than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 19.5g. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand59/10052/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand25/10012/100
Ease of carrying around57/10054/100

Compare the display of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Display of the vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1544, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has a 6.35inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.34inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB". The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?78/10076/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?82/10078/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

The main camera of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" uses the Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is slightly larger, so "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is recommended over "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for multitasking.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" edges out the competition. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet99/10085/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10079/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 96GB. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos92/10090/100

Which to buy, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" or "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"?

"vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 6.0inch screen. The "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" overall, "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Handling49/10042/100
Display67/10074/100
CPU specs96/10082/100
General rating81/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo Y3 (2019) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo Y3 (2019) 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
vivo Y3 (2019) 128GBGalaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
ColorPeacock blue/Peach powder/Ink blueWhite/Black/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.7mm x 159.4mm x 8.9mm80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm
Weight190.5g210.0g
Display size6.35inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15441080 x 1920
Pixel density268ppi367ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh5000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB4.0GB
Storage size128.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles