ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB vs Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2019-11-06 13:45:18, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:41:32
How are the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |||
General rating: | 69.2/100 (The 3475th of all smartphones) | 49.2/100 (The 3896th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 56/100 | - /100 | ||
Screen quality | 79/100 | 61/100 | ||
Performance | 78/100 | 65/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 93/100 | 87/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" or "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
The design of ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is 158.0mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
The design of Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
Which is the better design to use?
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | - |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 42/100 | - |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | - |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2280, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has a 6.3inch screen size.
Display of the Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB". The "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 78/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 82/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
The main camera of the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB", the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB". Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" than the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB". The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 86/100 | 78/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 70/100 | 52/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3200.0mAh.
Battery performance of Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" slightly more. Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 93/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 83/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB
The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB
The "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 1008GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 96/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" or "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" or "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB"?
Its perfect screen size of 6.3inch makes the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB", the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 56/100 | - |
Display | 79/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 78/100 | 65/100 |
General rating | 79/100 | 65/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB" and "Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade 10 Prime 64GB | Micromax Canvas Evok E483 16GB | |
Color | Black | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.2mm x 158.0mm x 7.9mm | |
Weight | 165.0g | |
Display size | 6.3inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 3200.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |