Vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB vs ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2019-11-18 18:31:31, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:57:38
How are the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" or "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
The design of vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is 157.3mm long, 74.7mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 185.0g.
The design of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is 154.2mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 158.8g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3.1mm in length, 1.2mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 26.1g. The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 60/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 29/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
Display of the vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.88inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 27MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB". The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" than the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 31/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3700.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" over the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 98/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB
The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB
The "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" or "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 95/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" or "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" or "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.39inch makes the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB", the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 53/100 | 55/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 47/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB" and "ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo S1 Pro (China) 256GB | ZTE Warp 7 (2016) 16GB | |
Color | Blue/Red/Midsummer dream | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.7mm x 157.3mm x 8.2mm | 76.0mm x 154.2mm x 9.1mm |
Weight | 185.0g | 158.8g |
Display size | 6.39inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 3700.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 | |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |