Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB vs AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
Created date: 2020-01-07 19:24:22, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:10:53
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB".
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |||
General rating: | 69.6/100 (The 3469th of all smartphones) | 66.7/100 (The 135th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 32/100 | 70/100 | ||
Screen quality | 77/100 | 67/100 | ||
Performance | 96/100 | 68/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 87/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 92/100 | 92/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
The design of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 164.8mm long, 79.2mm wide, and 18.2mm thick. It weighs 373.7g.
The design of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" is 135.0mm long, 67.0mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 134.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 29.8mm in length, 12.2mm in width, and 9.6mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 239.7g. The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 41/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 0/100 | 66/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 46/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
Display of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 468ppi. The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
Camera performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 21.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
The main camera of the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" has 21.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 92/100 | 92/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
The processing capability of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" uses the Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB", the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" than the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB". The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 99/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 94/100 | 54/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
Battery performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a battery capacity of 10300.0mAh.
Battery performance of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2400.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 7900mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" overall, "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 32/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 77/100 | 67/100 |
CPU specs | 96/100 | 68/100 |
General rating | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB | AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank 16GB | |
Color | Black | / / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.2mm x 164.8mm x 18.2mm | 67.0mm x 135.0mm x 8.6mm |
Weight | 373.7g | 134.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IGZO |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2160 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 468ppi |
Battery capacity | 10300.0mAh | 2400.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 | Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 |
CPU specs | 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 21.0MP | 21.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |