Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB and Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2020-01-07 20:44:56, Updated date: 2021-10-20 23:27:52

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBHTC One A9 (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBHTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBHTC One A9 (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.6
32/100
rating-image3.3
66/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.9
77/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Performancerating-image4.8
96/100
rating-image3.4
68/100
Storage sizerating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.6
92/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image3.0
60/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 164.8mm long, 79.2mm wide, and 18.2mm thick. It weighs 373.7g.

The design of HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" is 145.8mm long, 70.8mm wide, and 7.3mm thick. It weighs 143.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 19mm in length, 8.4mm in width, and 10.8mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 230.7g. The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand41/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10059/100
Ease of carrying around46/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 21.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

The main camera of the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 4.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?92/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10060/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB", the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" than the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB". The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet99/10079/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10054/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a battery capacity of 10300.0mAh.

Battery performance of HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2150.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 8150mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10072/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10049/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.7inch screen. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB", the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB

Handling32/10066/100
Display77/10070/100
CPU specs96/10068/100
General rating79/10068/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "HTC One A9 (2015) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBHTC One A9 (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBHTC One A9 (2015) 32GB
ColorBlackCarbon Gray/Opal Silver/Topaz Gold/Deep Garnet/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)79.2mm x 164.8mm x 18.2mm70.8mm x 145.8mm x 7.3mm
Weight373.7g143.0g
Display size5.7inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 21601080 x 1920
Pixel density423ppi440ppi
Battery capacity10300.0mAh2150.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6771 Helio P70Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617
CPU specs2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution21.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP4.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles