Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB vs LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2020-01-07 20:49:27, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:35:58

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBLeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBLeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBLeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

General rating:

69.6/100

(The 3469th of all smartphones)

65.4/100

(The 1154th of all smartphones)

Grip
32/100
60/100
Screen quality
77/100
74/100
Performance
96/100
87/100
Storage size
84/100
84/100
Battery
100/100
87/100
Rear-camera resolution
92/100
80/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is 164.8mm long, 79.2mm wide, and 18.2mm thick. It weighs 373.7g.

The design of LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" is 151.1mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 153.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 13.7mm in length, 5mm in width, and 10.7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 220.7g. The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand41/10067/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10050/100
Ease of carrying around46/10061/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 21.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

The main camera of the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?92/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 ,Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" equally. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" than the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet99/10094/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10078/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has a battery capacity of 10300.0mAh.

Battery performance of LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 7300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" over the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10087/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10074/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

The "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/100 -

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" or "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB". "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB

LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB

Handling32/10060/100
Display77/10074/100
CPU specs96/10087/100
General rating79/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GB" and "LeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBLeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB
Ulefone Armor 3WT 64GBLeEco Le 2 (2016) 64GB
ColorBlackRose gold/gold/silver/grey
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)79.2mm x 164.8mm x 18.2mm74.2mm x 151.1mm x 7.5mm
Weight373.7g153.0g
Display size5.7inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 21601080 x 1920
Pixel density423ppi400ppi
Battery capacity10300.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6771 Helio P70Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 ,Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs2.1GHz+2.1GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution21.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles