Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB vs alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
Created date: 2020-01-08 15:35:58, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:36:33
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB".
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |||
General rating: | 66.5/100 (The 3538th of all smartphones) | 27.6/100 (The 1989th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 44/100 | 78/100 | ||
Screen quality | 81/100 | 18/100 | ||
Performance | 86/100 | 15/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 64/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 20/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
The design of Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is 159.9mm long, 76.7mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 217.0g.
The design of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is 112.2mm long, 62.0mm wide, and 11.9mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 47.7mm in length, 14.7mm in width, and 1.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 117g. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 57/100 | 77/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 8/100 | 94/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 56/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
Display of the Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 417ppi. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has a 6.3inch screen size.
Display of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2.8inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 78/100 | 25/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 82/100 | 15/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has 25.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Camera performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The main camera of the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 23MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 20/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" uses the Exynos 9611 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 508GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB". The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" than the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 88/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 82/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4050.0mAh.
Battery performance of alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2750mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" over the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 64/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 40/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB
The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB
The "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 60GB. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" or "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.3inch makes the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB", the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 44/100 | 78/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 18/100 |
CPU specs | 86/100 | 15/100 |
General rating | 80/100 | 37/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB" and "alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy Xcover Pro 64GB | alcatel Pixi 3 (3.5) 4GB | |
Color | Black | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.7mm x 159.9mm x 10.0mm | 62.0mm x 112.2mm x 11.9mm |
Weight | 217.0g | 100.0g |
Display size | 6.3inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 417ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 4050.0mAh | 1300.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 9611 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 25.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 13.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |