Ulefone Armor X2 16GB vs ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2020-01-08 14:34:28, Updated date: 2022-06-02 14:28:41
How are the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |||
General rating: | 50.2/100 (The 3886th of all smartphones) | 58.8/100 (The 3770th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 37/100 | 58/100 | ||
Screen quality | 63/100 | 66/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 69/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 84/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 93/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 50/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" or "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
The design of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is 163.0mm long, 76.6mm wide, and 13.9mm thick. It weighs 256.0g.
The design of ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is 157.1mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 8.1mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 5.9mm in length, 0.7mm in width, and 5.8mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is more compact than "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 106g. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 49/100 | 63/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 0/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 52/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
Display of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 292ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has a 6.26inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.75inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" nor the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 78/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 81/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" uses the Unisoc SC9863A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB", the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB". The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" than the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB".
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 32/100 | 58/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has a battery capacity of 5500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3200.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" slightly more. Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 93/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 84/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB
The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 176GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 76/100 | 91/100 |
Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" or "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" or "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB". The "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" and the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB", the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 37/100 | 58/100 |
Display | 63/100 | 66/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 69/100 |
General rating | 61/100 | 73/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X2 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X2 16GB" and "ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Ulefone Armor X2 16GB | ZTE Blade V10 Vita 64GB | |
Color | Dark Gray/Rose Gold | Black/Green |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.6mm x 163.0mm x 13.9mm | 75.8mm x 157.1mm x 8.1mm |
Weight | 256.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 6.26inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 720 x 1520 |
Pixel density | 292ppi | 268ppi |
Battery capacity | 5500.0mAh | 3200.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6580 | Unisoc SC9863A |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |