Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB vs TECNO Camon CM 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2020-01-08 17:36:30, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:33:13

Ulefone Armor X 16GBTECNO Camon CM 32GB
Ulefone Armor X 16GBTECNO Camon CM 32GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor X 16GBTECNO Camon CM 32GB
Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.9
76.6mm x 163.0mm x 13.9mm
rating-image3.3
71.7mm x 152.2mm x 5.6mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1440
Performancerating-image2.5
Mediatek MT6739, 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
rating-image2.8
Mediatek MT6737H, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image3.9
32.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
5500.0mAh
rating-image4.6
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image5.0
13.0MP

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor X 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" is 163.0mm long, 76.6mm wide, and 13.9mm thick. It weighs 256.0g.

The design of TECNO Camon CM 32GB

The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is 152.2mm long, 71.7mm wide, and 5.6mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10.8mm in length, 4.8mm in width, and 8.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 106g. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand49/10072/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10053/100
Ease of carrying around52/10065/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor X 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 292ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the TECNO Camon CM 32GB

The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" nor the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10073/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10075/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X 16GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of TECNO Camon CM 32GB

The main camera of the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6739 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737H SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" than the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB".

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet72/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10045/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" has a battery capacity of 5500.0mAh.

Battery performance of TECNO Camon CM 32GB

The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" over the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10092/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10082/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the TECNO Camon CM 32GB

The "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 176GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10070/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" or "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" or "TECNO Camon CM 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB". "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" and "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" overall, "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Ulefone Armor X 16GB

TECNO Camon CM 32GB

Handling37/10065/100
Display63/10063/100
CPU specs49/10056/100
General rating62/10070/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the TECNO Camon CM 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X 16GB" and "TECNO Camon CM 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor X 16GBTECNO Camon CM 32GB
Ulefone Armor X 16GBTECNO Camon CM 32GB
ColorDark Gray/Rose GoldChampagne Gold/Midnight Black/City Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.6mm x 163.0mm x 13.9mm71.7mm x 152.2mm x 5.6mm
Weight256.0g150.0g
Display size5.5inch5.7inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1440
Pixel density292ppi282ppi
Battery capacity5500.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6739Mediatek MT6737H
CPU specs1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles