Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB vs BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2020-01-08 17:31:59, Updated date: 2021-10-20 13:48:35

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.7
34/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image4.8
96/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Storage sizerating-image4.2
84/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.9
77/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is 159.0mm long, 78.3mm wide, and 14.5mm thick. It weighs 270.0g.

The design of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 147.0mm long, 74.5mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 12mm in length, 3.7mm in width, and 5.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is more compact than "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 128g. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10063/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10060/100
Ease of carrying around49/10059/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The main camera of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6757 Helio P25 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 4GB difference in memory capacity. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB". The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10074/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10037/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4700.0mAh.

Battery performance of BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" over the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10077/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10057/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10067/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB

Handling34/10060/100
Display70/10074/100
CPU specs96/10054/100
General rating77/10064/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GBBenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
ColorGray/GoldGlam Pink/Chic Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.3mm x 159.0mm x 14.5mm74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm
Weight270.0g142.0g
Display size5.0inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201080 x 1920
Pixel density440ppi423ppi
Battery capacity4700.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6757 Helio P25Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU specs2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB2.0GB
Storage size64.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles