Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB and Ulefone Armor 2 64GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2020-01-08 18:54:06, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:40:01

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBHTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GBHTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBHTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

General rating:

65.9/100

(The 3555th of all smartphones)

60.8/100

(The 2132th of all smartphones)

Grip
34/100
58/100
Screen quality
70/100
83/100
Performance
96/100
87/100
Storage size
84/100
78/100
Battery
100/100
84/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
90/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
60/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is 159.0mm long, 78.3mm wide, and 14.5mm thick. It weighs 270.0g.

The design of HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is 151.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.6mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 8mm in length, 6.2mm in width, and 4.9mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 102g. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10067/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10040/100
Ease of carrying around49/10061/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" uses a Super LCD3 liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 564ppi. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

The main camera of the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has 20.0MP. The front camera has 4.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 4MP difference in comparison. The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10090/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10060/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6757 Helio P25 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6795T Helio X10 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" equally. Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" than the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10094/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games94/10079/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4700.0mAh.

Battery performance of HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2840.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1860mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" over the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10084/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10068/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

The "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" or "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" or "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" or "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" a lot easier to use. "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GB

HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB

Handling34/10058/100
Display70/10083/100
CPU specs96/10087/100
General rating77/10075/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor 2 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor 2 64GB" and "HTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor 2 64GBHTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB
Ulefone Armor 2 64GBHTC One M9+ (2015) 32GB
ColorGray/GoldGunmetal Gray/Silver Gold/Amber Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.3mm x 159.0mm x 14.5mm72.0mm x 151.0mm x 9.6mm
Weight270.0g168.0g
Display size5.0inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper LCD3
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201440 x 2560
Pixel density440ppi564ppi
Battery capacity4700.0mAh2840.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6757 Helio P25Mediatek MT6795T Helio X10
CPU specs2.6GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP20.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP4.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles