Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G or Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2020-02-10 21:55:35, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:06:31

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBIcemobile Apollo Touch 3G
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBIcemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G".

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBIcemobile Apollo Touch 3G
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G
General rating:
Griprating-image2.3
76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm
rating-image3.8
64.5mm x 110.5mm x 12.4mm
Screen qualityrating-image4.6
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 6.9inch, 1440 x 3200
rating-image1
TFT, 3.5inch, 320 x 480
Performancerating-image5.0
Exynos 990, 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 16.0GB
rating-image1
Cortex-A9, 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores), 512.0MB
Storage sizerating-image4.7
512.0GB
rating-image1
512.0MB
Batteryrating-image5.0
5000.0mAh
rating-image2.7
1200.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
108.0MP
rating-image1.0
2.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
40.0MP
rating-image

What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

The design of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 166.9mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 222.0g.

The design of Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" is 110.5mm long, 64.5mm wide, and 12.4mm thick. It weighs 100.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 56.4mm in length, 11.5mm in width, and 3.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" is more compact than "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 122g. The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10072/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand4/10094/100
Ease of carrying around58/10065/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

Display of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 508ppi. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 6.9inch screen size.

Display of the Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 3.4inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?88/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

Camera performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 108.0MP. The front camera has 40.0MP.

Camera performance of Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

The main camera of the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 106MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

The processing capability of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 16.0GB.

The processing capability of the Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" uses the Cortex-A9 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 496GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" than the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games100/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

Battery performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" has a battery capacity of 1200.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" over the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10054/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10032/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 512.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

The "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games93/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.9inch makes the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is overall the clear winner.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G

Handling45/10076/100
Display91/10018/100
CPU specs100/10013/100
General rating86/10033/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Icemobile Apollo Touch 3G". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBIcemobile Apollo Touch 3G
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBIcemobile Apollo Touch 3G
ColorCosmic Grey/Cosmic Blackwhite,black,blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm64.5mm x 110.5mm x 12.4mm
Weight222.0g100.0g
Display size6.9inch3.5inch
Display typeDynamic AMOLED 2XTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 3200320 x 480
Pixel density508ppi164ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh1200.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 990Cortex-A9
CPU specs2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size16.0GB512.0MB
Storage size512.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution108.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution40.0MP

Check price

New articles