Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB or Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2020-02-10 20:36:58, Updated date: 2021-10-20 12:47:54

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBLava A97 (2016) 8GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBLava A97 (2016) 8GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB".

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBLava A97 (2016) 8GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

General rating:

80.7/100

(The 3014th of all smartphones)

41/100

(The 1711th of all smartphones)

Grip
45/100
60/100
Screen quality
91/100
48/100
Performance
100/100
28/100
Storage size
93/100
35/100
Battery
100/100
79/100
Rear-camera resolution
100/100
35/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

The design of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 166.9mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 222.0g.

The design of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 21.4mm in length, 4mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is bigger than "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 62g. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand4/10046/100
Ease of carrying around58/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

Display of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 508ppi. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 6.9inch screen size.

Display of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.9inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?88/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 108.0MP. The front camera has 40.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 103MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 35MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 16.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 15GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games100/10012/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2650mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" over the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10079/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10061/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 512.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 504GB. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games93/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 56/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.9inch makes the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is overall the clear winner.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Lava A97 (2016) 8GB

Handling45/10060/100
Display91/10048/100
CPU specs100/10028/100
General rating86/10048/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBLava A97 (2016) 8GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBLava A97 (2016) 8GB
ColorCosmic Grey/Cosmic BlackBlack/Gold/Gray
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm
Weight222.0g160.0g
Display size6.9inch5.0inch
Display typeDynamic AMOLED 2XTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 3200480 x 854
Pixel density508ppi195ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh2350.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 990
CPU specs2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size16.0GB1.0GB
Storage size512.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution108.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution40.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles