Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB vs vivo V3 (2016) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2020-02-10 21:18:47, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:22:24

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBvivo V3 (2016) 32GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBvivo V3 (2016) 32GB

How are the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBvivo V3 (2016) 32GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.3
45/100
rating-image3.3
66/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Performancerating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.3
66/100
Storage sizerating-image4.7
93/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.2
83/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

The design of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is 166.9mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 222.0g.

The design of vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is 143.6mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 23.3mm in length, 5mm in width, and 1.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is more compact than "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 84g. The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand4/10063/100
Ease of carrying around58/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

Display of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 508ppi. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a 6.9inch screen size.

Display of the vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.9inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?88/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 108.0MP. The front camera has 40.0MP.

Camera performance of vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 95MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 32MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 16.0GB.

The processing capability of the vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 13GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is the better choice to buy over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB". Both the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" than the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10079/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games100/10053/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2550.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2450mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" over the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". Both the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10083/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10068/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has 512.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

The "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 480GB. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games93/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 90/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" or "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.9inch makes the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is overall the clear winner.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB

vivo V3 (2016) 32GB

Handling45/10066/100
Display91/10056/100
CPU specs100/10066/100
General rating86/10069/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the vivo V3 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GB" and "vivo V3 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBvivo V3 (2016) 32GB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 512GBvivo V3 (2016) 32GB
ColorCosmic Grey/Cosmic BlackGold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm71.0mm x 143.6mm x 7.5mm
Weight222.0g138.0g
Display size6.9inch5.0inch
Display typeDynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 3200720 x 1280
Pixel density508ppi293ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh2550.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 990Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616
CPU specs2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size16.0GB3.0GB
Storage size512.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution108.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution40.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles