Which one is better, the Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB or Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-02-10 14:36:12, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:14:23
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB".
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |||
General rating: | 79.4/100 (The 3045th of all smartphones) | 43.8/100 (The 2565th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 55/100 | 72/100 | ||
Screen quality | 91/100 | 53/100 | ||
Performance | 99/100 | 32/100 | ||
Storage size | 93/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 69/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 90/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" or "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
The design of Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is 161.9mm long, 73.7mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 188.0g.
The design of Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is 140.1mm long, 67.5mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 119.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 21.8mm in length, 6.2mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is bigger than "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 69g. The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 73/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 27/100 | 79/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
Display of the Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 523ppi. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a 6.7inch screen size.
Display of the Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB". The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 81/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 86/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 10.0MP.
Camera performance of Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 56MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 90/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" uses the Nvidia Tegra 4i SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB", the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 11GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB". The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" than the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB". The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 58/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 13/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" over the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB". The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 69/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 44/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB
The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has 512.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB
The "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 508GB. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 93/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" or "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" or "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.7inch makes the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB", the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 91/100 | 53/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 32/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 49/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB" and "Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy S20+ 5G 512GB | Wiko Wax (2014) 4GB | |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cosmic Black | Black/White/Coral/Turquoise |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm | 67.5mm x 140.1mm x 8.8mm |
Weight | 188.0g | 119.0g |
Display size | 6.7inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 523ppi | 312ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | Nvidia Tegra 4i |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |