Which one is better, the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB or Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-02-10 17:00:02, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:16:26
How are the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 78.9/100 (The 3066th of all smartphones) | 41/100 (The 1711th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 55/100 | 60/100 | ||
Screen quality | 91/100 | 48/100 | ||
Performance | 98/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 79/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 90/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
The design of Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is 161.9mm long, 73.7mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 186.0g.
The design of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.4mm in length, 1.7mm in width, and 1.3mm in thickness. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 26g. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 28/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
Display of the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 523ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a 6.7inch screen size.
Display of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 81/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 86/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 10.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 59MP difference in comparison. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 90/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 7GB difference in memory capacity. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" than the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2150mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" over the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 120GB. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" or "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.7inch makes the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is overall the clear winner.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | 60/100 |
Display | 91/100 | 48/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 48/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB" and "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 128GB | Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cosmic Black | Black/Gold/Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.7mm x 161.9mm x 7.8mm | 72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm |
Weight | 186.0g | 160.0g |
Display size | 6.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 523ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 2350.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |