Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB vs ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2020-02-10 18:19:19, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:48:00
How are the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 79.7/100 (The 3035th of all smartphones) | 51.9/100 (The 2355th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 63/100 | 71/100 | ||
Screen quality | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Performance | 98/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 72/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 90/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" or "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
The design of Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is 151.7mm long, 69.1mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
The design of ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 6.6mm thick. It weighs 130.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 33g. The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 72/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 44/100 | 70/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 65/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
Display of the Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 565ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 77/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 81/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 10.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 56MP difference in comparison. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 90/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" uses the Exynos 990 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8928 Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" than the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 34/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" over the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 49/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 112GB. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" or "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" or "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB"?
"ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.2inch makes the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is overall the clear winner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 71/100 |
Display | 90/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 50/100 |
General rating | 87/100 | 61/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB" and "ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Samsung Galaxy S20 128GB | ZTE Star 1 (2014) 16GB | |
Color | Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud Pink | Pink/Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 69.1mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm | 69.0mm x 139.0mm x 6.6mm |
Weight | 163.0g | 130.0g |
Display size | 6.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 565ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2300.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 990 | Qualcomm MSM8928 Snapdragon 400 |
CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.6GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 10.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |