Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB or Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2020-02-16 19:44:35, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:10:02

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB".

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.3
45/100
rating-image4.4
88/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image1
18/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image1
15/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1
2/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image1.3
25/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image2.8
55/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The design of Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is 166.9mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 220.0g.

The design of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is 118.4mm long, 56.2mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 48.5mm in length, 19.7mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 127g. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10088/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand6/100100/100
Ease of carrying around58/10077/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Display of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" uses a Dynamic AMOLED 2X liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 3200, and the pixel density is 508ppi. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has a 6.9inch screen size.

Display of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 3.4inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?88/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Camera performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has 108.0MP. The front camera has 40.0MP.

Camera performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The main camera of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 3.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 105MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 37MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10025/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10055/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" uses the Exynos 990 ,Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 244GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" than the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/1004/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

Battery performance of Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1350.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3650mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" over the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10061/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10038/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 384GB. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" or "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" or "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.9inch makes the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is overall the clear winner.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB

Plum Sync 3.5 512MB

Handling45/10088/100
Display91/10018/100
CPU specs99/10015/100
General rating86/10038/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GB" and "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
Galaxy S20 Ultra 128GBPlum Sync 3.5 512MB
ColorCosmic Grey/Cosmic Black/Cloud WhiteBlack/White/Red/Blue/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 166.9mm x 8.8mm56.2mm x 118.4mm x 9.8mm
Weight220.0g93.0g
Display size6.9inch3.5inch
Display typeDynamic AMOLED 2XTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 3200320 x 480
Pixel density508ppi164ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh1350.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 990 ,Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865Mediatek MT6572M
CPU specs2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB256.0MB
Storage size128.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution108.0MP3.0MP
Front-camera resolution40.0MP3.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles