TECNO Camon 15 64GB vs Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2020-02-20 21:12:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:37:49
How are the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
The design of TECNO Camon 15 64GB
The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is 164.1mm long, 76.4mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 196.0g.
The design of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 153.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 11mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 36g. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 60/100 | 61/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 22/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the display of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
Display of the TECNO Camon 15 64GB
The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1600, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has a 6.55inch screen size.
Display of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.04inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB". The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 80/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 85/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of TECNO Camon 15 64GB
The main camera of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 32MP difference in comparison. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the TECNO Camon 15 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" equally. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 96/100 | 99/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of TECNO Camon 15 64GB
The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" over the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the TECNO Camon 15 64GB
The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?
"Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. There isn't much difference between "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 49/100 | 56/100 |
Display | 68/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 93/100 | 94/100 |
General rating | 81/100 | 76/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the TECNO Camon 15 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "TECNO Camon 15 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
TECNO Camon 15 64GB | Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Shoal Gold/Fascinating Purple/Jade | Silver/Gold |
OS | IOS | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.4mm x 164.1mm x 8.8mm | 76.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 196.0g | 160.0g |
Display size | 6.55inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1600 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 | Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |