Vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB and ZTE Blade S7 32GB review
Created date: 2020-02-26 16:06:51, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:22:41
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" or "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
The design of vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is 158.5mm long, 74.9mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 214.5g.
The design of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is 142.0mm long, 67.0mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 131.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.5mm in length, 7.9mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is more compact than "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 83.5g. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 62/100 | 76/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 9/100 | 69/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
Display of the vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 408ppi. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a 6.44inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.44inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
Camera performance of vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 35MP difference in comparison. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. Both the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
The processing capability of the vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB", the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 9GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB". Both the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" than the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB". The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 53/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
Battery performance of vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4400.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1900mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" over the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB". Both the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade S7 32GB
The "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 70/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" or "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" or "ZTE Blade S7 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.44inch makes the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB", the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 47/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 66/100 |
General rating | 84/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade S7 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB" and "ZTE Blade S7 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo iQOO 3 5G 256GB | ZTE Blade S7 32GB | |
Color | Volcano Orange/Tornado Black/Quantum Silver | Black/White/Yellow |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.9mm x 158.5mm x 9.2mm | 67.0mm x 142.0mm x 7.2mm |
Weight | 214.5g | 131.0g |
Display size | 6.44inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 408ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 4400.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |