Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB vs. Galaxy Star 2 4GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2020-03-09 17:35:15, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:17:21

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GBGalaxy Star 2 4GB
vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GBGalaxy Star 2 4GB

How are the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GBGalaxy Star 2 4GB
vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.3
45/100
rating-image4.0
79/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.0
79/100
rating-image1
18/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image1
13/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image
- /100

What is the difference between the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

The design of vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is 167.4mm long, 76.1mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 219.5g.

The design of Galaxy Star 2 4GB

The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" is 109.8mm long, 59.9mm wide, and 11.8mm thick. It weighs 107.6g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 57.6mm in length, 16.1mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 111.9g. The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand59/10080/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand6/10088/100
Ease of carrying around57/10071/100

Compare the display of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

Display of the vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2256, and the pixel density is 363ppi. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has a 6.89inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy Star 2 4GB

The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has a 3.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 3.38inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance. In the gaming end, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB". The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?83/10025/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?88/10015/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

Camera performance of vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

The main camera of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy Star 2 4GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 62MP difference in comparison. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

The processing capability of the vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" uses the SC6815A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB", the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 500GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB". The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" than the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB". The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

Battery performance of vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy Star 2 4GB

The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" over the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB". The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10059/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10036/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy Star 2 4GB

The "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 252GB. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 55/100

Which to buy, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" or "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" or "Galaxy Star 2 4GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.89inch makes the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB", the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB

Galaxy Star 2 4GB

Handling45/10079/100
Display79/10018/100
CPU specs99/10013/100
General rating83/10036/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy Star 2 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GB" and "Galaxy Star 2 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GBGalaxy Star 2 4GB
vivo NEX 3S 5G 256GBGalaxy Star 2 4GB
ColorBlack/Blue/OrangeIris Charcoal/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.1mm x 167.4mm x 9.4mm59.9mm x 109.8mm x 11.8mm
Weight219.5g107.6g
Display size6.89inch3.5inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 2256320 x 480
Pixel density363ppi164ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh1300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865SC6815A
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB512.0MB
Storage size256.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution64.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles