Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB vs. ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2020-03-19 22:57:07, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:50:09

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GBARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GBARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

How are the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GBARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

General rating:

46.9/100

(The 3915th of all smartphones)

57.8/100

(The 394th of all smartphones)

Grip
61/100
62/100
Screen quality
64/100
70/100
Performance
28/100
56/100
Storage size
70/100
84/100
Battery
98/100
74/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
46/100

What is the difference between the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

The design of Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" is 147.3mm long, 71.2mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

The design of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is 141.0mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 10.3mm thick. It weighs 154.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 6.3mm in length, 1.2mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Both the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 1g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand49/10050/100
Ease of carrying around62/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

Display of the Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 294ppi. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has a 5.71inch screen size.

Display of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.71inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB". The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

Camera performance of Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

The main camera of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

The main camera of the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5.1MP difference in comparison. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3.75MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10046/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

The processing capability of the Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm QM215 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB", the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB".

The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" than the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB". The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10076/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10039/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

Battery performance of Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet98/10074/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos93/10053/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

The "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 75/100

Which to buy, the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" or "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". If you want a larger screen, "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" and "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" overall, "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB

ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB

Handling61/10062/100
Display64/10070/100
CPU specs28/10056/100
General rating59/10065/100

Is it recommended to buy the Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GBARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
Nokia 1.3 (2020) 16GBARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
ColorCyan/Charcoal/Sand/ /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.2mm x 147.3mm x 9.4mm70.0mm x 141.0mm x 10.3mm
Weight155.0g154.0g
Display size5.71inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15201080 x 1920
Pixel density294ppi440ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm QM215Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.25MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles