Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Ulefone Armor X7 16GB vs AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Created date: 2020-03-23 18:24:58, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:52:56

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

General rating:

57/100

(The 3797th of all smartphones)

58.9/100

(The 351th of all smartphones)

Grip
34/100
58/100
Screen quality
56/100
74/100
Performance
52/100
56/100
Storage size
70/100
78/100
Battery
100/100
86/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is 150.0mm long, 78.9mm wide, and 14.6mm thick. It weighs 234.0g.

The design of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 140.0mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 154.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10mm in length, 4.9mm in width, and 5.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 80g. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10050/100
Ease of carrying around49/10059/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 407ppi. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a 5.4inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.4inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB". The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10071/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10072/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 2.1MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 2.9MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" uses the MSM8974AB SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" edges out the competition.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet73/10076/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games35/10039/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" over the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10086/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10072/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 78/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.4inch makes the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. When comparing "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" and "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" overall, "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Handling34/10058/100
Display56/10074/100
CPU specs52/10056/100
General rating61/10067/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
ColorBlack/OrangeOrange/Black/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.9mm x 150.0mm x 14.6mm74.0mm x 140.0mm x 9.3mm
Weight234.0g154.0g
Display size5.0inch5.4inch
Display typeIPS LCDIGZO
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density293ppi407ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3300.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A20MSM8974AB
CPU specs1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.1MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles