Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB vs AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2020-03-23 18:26:12, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:54:10

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

How are the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image1.7
34/100
rating-image3.2
63/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.8
56/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Performancerating-image2.6
52/100
rating-image2.5
49/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image4.0
80/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image2.3
46/100

What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

The design of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is 150.0mm long, 78.9mm wide, and 14.6mm thick. It weighs 234.0g.

The design of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is 135.0mm long, 68.0mm wide, and 10.9mm thick. It weighs 152.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 15mm in length, 10.9mm in width, and 3.6mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 82g. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand0/10051/100
Ease of carrying around49/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

Display of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 299ppi. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" has a 4.9inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" nor the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10066/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10056/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" has 16.3MP. The front camera has 1.2MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3.3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3.8MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10080/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10046/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" uses the Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet73/10072/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games35/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2320.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1680mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB". The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10065/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10041/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 70/100

Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB". There isn't much difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GB

AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB

Handling34/10063/100
Display56/10054/100
CPU specs52/10049/100
General rating61/10060/100

Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB
Ulefone Armor X7 16GBAQUOS PHONE ZETA SH-02E docomo 32GB
ColorBlack/OrangeRed/White/Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.9mm x 150.0mm x 14.6mm68.0mm x 135.0mm x 10.9mm
Weight234.0g152.0g
Display size5.0inch4.9inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi299ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh2320.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6761 Helio A20Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064
CPU specs1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.3MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.2MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles