Ulefone Armor X7 16GB vs ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2020-03-23 19:55:20, Updated date: 2020-04-16 22:23:18
How are the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
The design of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is 150.0mm long, 78.9mm wide, and 14.6mm thick. It weighs 234.0g.
The design of ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is 140.3mm long, 69.2mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 130.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 9.6mm in length, 9.7mm in width, and 7.6mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 104g. The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 44/100 | 74/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 0/100 | 70/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 49/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
Display of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB". The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8974AB Snapdragon 801 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" edges out the competition.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 73/100 | 76/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 35/100 | 39/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2400.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1600mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" over the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 52/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB
The "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" or "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 34/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 52/100 | 56/100 |
General rating | 61/100 | 64/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X7 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
The "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X7 16GB" and "ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Ulefone Armor X7 16GB | ZTE Star 2 (2014) 16GB | |
Color | Black/Orange | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.9mm x 150.0mm x 14.6mm | 69.2mm x 140.3mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 234.0g | 130.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2400.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 | Qualcomm MSM8974AB Snapdragon 801 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |