Which one is better, the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB or vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-04-22 19:19:33, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:45:36
How are the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" or "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
The design of vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is 163.7mm long, 75.6mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 198.1g.
The design of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is 141.0mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 10.3mm thick. It weighs 154.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 22.6mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 1.4mm in thickness. "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is bigger than "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 44g. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 61/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 20/100 | 50/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 58/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
Display of the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2408, and the pixel density is 401ppi. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a 6.57inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.57inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" looks sleeker than that of "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 80/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 85/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
Camera performance of vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 34.9MP difference in comparison. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 14.75MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
The processing capability of the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB", the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB". The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" than the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 76/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 39/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
Battery performance of vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2600.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1900mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" over the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 53/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB
The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB
The "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 192GB. "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 75/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" or "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" or "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.57inch makes the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB", the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 49/100 | 62/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 56/100 |
General rating | 85/100 | 65/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB" and "ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G 256GB | ARROWS A 301F SoftBank 64GB | |
Color | Blue/Black+Dark Blue | / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.6mm x 163.7mm x 8.9mm | 70.0mm x 141.0mm x 10.3mm |
Weight | 198.1g | 154.0g |
Display size | 6.57inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2408 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 401ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 2600.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 1.25MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |