Which one is better, the MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB or vivo X50 Lite 128GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-05-11 13:53:15
How are the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |||
General rating: | 75.8/100 (The 3216th of all smartphones) | 36.2/100 (The 881th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 52/100 | 71/100 | ||
Screen quality | 80/100 | 34/100 | ||
Performance | 98/100 | 14/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 8/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 58/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 40/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" or "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
The design of vivo X50 Lite 128GB
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is 159.3mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 186.7g.
The design of MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" is 128.0mm long, 63.0mm wide, and 11.0mm thick. It weighs 133.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 31.3mm in length, 12.2mm in width, and 2.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" is more compact than "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 53.6g. The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 62/100 | 77/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 28/100 | 67/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
Display of the vivo X50 Lite 128GB
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 403ppi. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a 6.38inch screen size.
Display of the MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" uses a Super AMOLED( EL) liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2.38inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB". The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
Camera performance of vivo X50 Lite 128GB
The main camera of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
The main camera of the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has 8.1MP. The front camera has 0.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 39.9MP difference in comparison. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 16MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 40/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X50 Lite 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" uses the Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB", the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 504GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is the better choice to buy over the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB". The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" than the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB". The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 20/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 3/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
Battery performance of vivo X50 Lite 128GB
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.
Battery performance of MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has a battery capacity of 1700.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" over the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB". The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 58/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 35/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X50 Lite 128GB
The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB
The "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has 2.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 126GB. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 8/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 54/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" or "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" or "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.38inch makes the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB", the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 52/100 | 71/100 |
Display | 80/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 14/100 |
General rating | 85/100 | 39/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X50 Lite 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X50 Lite 128GB" and "MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X50 Lite 128GB | MEDIAS CH 101N SoftBank 2GB | |
Color | Nebula Blue/Jade Black | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.2mm x 159.3mm x 8.7mm | 63.0mm x 128.0mm x 11.0mm |
Weight | 186.7g | 133.0g |
Display size | 6.38inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED( EL) |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 403ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 4500.0mAh | 1700.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 | Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 2.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 8.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 0.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |