A comparive review of the differences between the Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB and vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2020-05-31 14:06:14, Updated date: 2020-07-31 17:32:50
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB".
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |||
General rating: | 76.5/100 (The 3169th of all smartphones) | 73.8/100 (The 1019th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 56/100 | 53/100 | ||
Screen quality | 81/100 | 89/100 | ||
Performance | 99/100 | 96/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 96/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 70/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
The design of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 158.5mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 181.5g.
The design of Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 158.1mm long, 73.8mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 189.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.4mm in length, 1mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 7.5g. "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" weighs less than "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" and is easier to handle.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 69/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 31/100 | 26/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
Display of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2376, and the pixel density is 397ppi. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a 6.56inch screen size.
Display of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2960, and the pixel density is 530ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.35inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 80/100 | 77/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 85/100 | 81/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
Camera performance of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has 50.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 38MP difference in comparison. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 24MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" uses the Exynos 9810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 6GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" equally. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" as it has better performance. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 99/100 | 94/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
Battery performance of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4315.0mAh.
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 815mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 96/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 89/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" or "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". If you want a larger screen, "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.2inch screen. There isn't much difference between "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 56/100 | 53/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 89/100 |
CPU specs | 99/100 | 96/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 82/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
Color | Blue/Brown | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue/Polaris Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.8mm x 158.5mm x 8.0mm | 73.8mm x 158.1mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 181.5g | 189.0g |
Display size | 6.56inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2376 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 397ppi | 530ppi |
Battery capacity | 4315.0mAh | 3500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Exynos 9810 |
CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 12.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 50.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |