Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB vs ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Created date: 2020-06-01 15:49:50, Updated date: 2022-03-29 15:22:25

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GBARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB
Samsung Galaxy M01 32GBARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

How are the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GBARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB
Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image4.0
79/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image1.5
29/100
Performancerating-image3.8
75/100
rating-image1
17/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image1.8
35/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image2.0
40/100

What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

The design of Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is 147.5mm long, 70.9mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.

The design of ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" is 119.0mm long, 60.0mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 115.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 28.5mm in length, 10.9mm in width, and 1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" is more compact than "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 53g. The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10081/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand40/10082/100
Ease of carrying around62/10072/100

Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

Display of the Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" uses a PLS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 295ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 252ppi. The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has a 3.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" nor the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10033/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10019/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

The main camera of the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 0.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10040/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" uses the Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB", the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB". The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" than the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB". The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet83/10020/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games67/1008/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1520.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2480mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" over the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB". The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10056/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10033/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 55/100

Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" or "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" or "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB", the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB

ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB

Handling59/10079/100
Display64/10029/100
CPU specs75/10017/100
General rating72/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy M01 32GB" and "ARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Samsung Galaxy M01 32GBARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB
Samsung Galaxy M01 32GBARROWS Me F-11D docomo 4GB
ColorBlack/Blue/RedPrecious White/Precious Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.9mm x 147.5mm x 9.8mm60.0mm x 119.0mm x 10.8mm
Weight168.0g115.0g
Display size5.7inch3.7inch
Display typePLS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1520480 x 800
Pixel density295ppi252ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh1520.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439Snapdragon S2 MSM8255
CPU specs1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB1.0GB
Storage size32.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP0.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles