Compare Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB vs Lava A50 (2016)
Created date: 2020-06-04 13:31:02
How are the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |||
General rating: | 80/100 (The 3028th of all smartphones) | 37.2/100 (The 2780th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 55/100 | - /100 | ||
Screen quality | 81/100 | 34/100 | ||
Performance | 98/100 | 23/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 71/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | - /100 |
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "Lava A50 (2016)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" or "Lava A50 (2016)"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)" ?
What is the difference between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "Lava A50 (2016)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
The design of Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is 159.3mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 183.0g.
The design of Lava A50 (2016)
The "Lava A50 (2016)" is 123.0mm long, 63.4mm wide, and 9.7mm thick.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 36.3mm in length, 10.6mm in width, and 1.8mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava A50 (2016)" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava A50 (2016)", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Lava A50 (2016)" is more compact than "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 78/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 30/100 | - |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the display of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
Display of the Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 409ppi. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a 6.43inch screen size.
Display of the Lava A50 (2016)
The "Lava A50 (2016)" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava A50 (2016)" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 2.42inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A50 (2016)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
In terms of display, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A50 (2016)". The "Lava A50 (2016)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
Camera performance of Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
The main camera of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava A50 (2016)
The main camera of the "Lava A50 (2016)" has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 43MP difference in comparison. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
The processing capability of the Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava A50 (2016)
The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava A50 (2016)", the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 504GB difference in memory capacity. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A50 (2016)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB". The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" than the "Lava A50 (2016)". The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A50 (2016)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 6/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
Battery performance of Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava A50 (2016)
The "Lava A50 (2016)" has a battery capacity of 1550.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2450mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" over the "Lava A50 (2016)". Both the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "Lava A50 (2016)" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 47/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)"
The storage capacity of the Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB
The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Lava A50 (2016)
The "Lava A50 (2016)" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 248GB. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A50 (2016)" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A50 (2016)" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" or "Lava A50 (2016)"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" or "Lava A50 (2016)"?
Its perfect screen size of 6.43inch makes the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and the "Lava A50 (2016)", the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | - |
Display | 81/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 23/100 |
General rating | 85/100 | 36/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Lava A50 (2016), compared with other smartphones?
The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A50 (2016)" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB" and "Lava A50 (2016)". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Oppo Reno4 5G 256GB | Lava A50 (2016) | |
Color | Black/Blue/Purple | black + silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.0mm x 159.3mm x 7.8mm | 63.4mm x 123.0mm x 9.7mm |
Weight | 183.0g | |
Display size | 6.43inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 409ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 1550.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G | |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP |