Compare Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB vs OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
Created date: 2020-06-09 17:44:19, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:40:13
How are the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
The design of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is 150.0mm long, 78.9mm wide, and 14.6mm thick. It weighs 234.0g.
The design of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 152.7mm long, 74.7mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 2.6mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 7.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 76g. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 44/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 0/100 | 47/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 49/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
Display of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" uses a Optic AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB". The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is slightly larger, so "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is recommended over "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" for multitasking.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" equally. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" than the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB". The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 80/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 64/100 | 75/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB
The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | - |
Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" overall, "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 34/100 | 59/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 71/100 | 77/100 |
General rating | 64/100 | 73/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
Color | Black/Orange | Graphite/soft gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.9mm x 150.0mm x 14.6mm | 74.7mm x 152.7mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 234.0g | 158.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Optic AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |