Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB vs vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
Created date: 2020-06-09 18:06:51, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:02:45
How are the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
The design of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is 150.0mm long, 78.9mm wide, and 14.6mm thick. It weighs 234.0g.
The design of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is 155.1mm long, 75.1mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.5g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 5mm in length, 3.8mm in width, and 6.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 70.5g. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 44/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 0/100 | 43/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 49/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
Display of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1520, and the pixel density is 271ppi. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" looks sleeker than that of "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" nor the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 77/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 81/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
Camera performance of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The main camera of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The main camera of the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
The processing capability of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB", the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" than the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB". The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 79/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 64/100 | 81/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
Battery performance of Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 4030.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 30mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB". Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.
The storage capacity of the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB
The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 91/100 |
Which to buy, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" or "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.2inch makes the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" and the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB", the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 34/100 | 57/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 66/100 |
CPU specs | 71/100 | 84/100 |
General rating | 64/100 | 76/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
The "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is difficult to hold and use compared to other smartphones. People with large hands can probably manage to operate it with one hand, but a smaller, more compact phone would be preferable for most people. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB" and "vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Ulefone Armor X7 Pro 32GB | vivo Y93 (2018) 64GB | |
Color | Black/Orange | Starry Black/Sunset Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.9mm x 150.0mm x 14.6mm | 75.1mm x 155.1mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 234.0g | 163.5g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1520 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 271ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 4030.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A20 | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.95GHz+1.45GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |