Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB vs Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Created date: 2020-07-27 18:02:41, Updated date: 2022-06-22 22:43:18

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GBGalaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GBGalaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB".

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GBGalaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

General rating:

81.7/100

(The 3008th of all smartphones)

71.7/100

(The 46th of all smartphones)

Grip
42/100
53/100
Screen quality
80/100
89/100
Performance
100/100
96/100
Storage size
90/100
84/100
Battery
100/100
96/100
Rear-camera resolution
100/100
70/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is 168.6mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 220.0g.

The design of Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is 158.0mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 187.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10.5mm in length, 4mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is bigger than "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is more compact than "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 33g. The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand6/10028/100
Ease of carrying around55/10060/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387ppi. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a 6.65inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2960, and the pixel density is 530ppi. The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" has a 6.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.45inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB". The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10077/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10081/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

The main camera of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" has 12.2MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 51.8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10070/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 16.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 845 SDM845 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 10GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" equally. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" as it has better performance. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/100100/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games100/10094/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB". Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10096/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10089/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

The "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

The "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 400.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 192GB. "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 94/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" or "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" or "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is recommended as it has a 6.2inch screen. There isn't much difference between "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB

Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB

Handling42/10053/100
Display80/10089/100
CPU specs100/10096/100
General rating80/10081/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GB" and "Galaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GBGalaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S 256GBGalaxy S9+ SCV39 au 64GB
ColorSilver/Pulse/
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.0mm x 168.6mm x 9.8mm74.0mm x 158.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight220.0g187.0g
Display size6.65inch6.2inch
Display typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 23401440 x 2960
Pixel density387ppi530ppi
Battery capacity4500.0mAh3500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5GSnapdragon 845 SDM845
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size16.0GB6.0GB
Storage size256.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution64.0MP12.2MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles