A comparive review of the differences between the vivo X50 and ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 07/27/2020, 07:57:47, Updated date: 07/27/2020, 13:30:07
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | ||
 |  |
How are the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50 different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |||
Compare with another product | Compare with another product | |||
| General rating: | 82.1/100 (The 24th of all smartphones) | 80.5/100 (The 52th of all smartphones) | ||
| Grip | 42/100 | 55/100 | ||
| Screen quality | 80/100 | 81/100 | ||
| Performance | 100/100 | 98/100 | ||
| Storage size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
| Battery | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||
| Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 100/100 | ||
| Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 100/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 1-2.Compare the display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
- 2.Which to buy, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S or vivo X50
- 3.What are the spec differences between the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S andvivo X50?
What is the difference between the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
The design of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S is 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) long, 3.1 inches (78 mm) wide, and 0.4 inches (9.8 mm) thick. It weighs 218 oz (218 g).
The design of vivo X50
The vivo X50 is 6.3 inches (159.5 mm) long, 3.0 inches (75.4 mm) wide, and 0.3 inches (7.5 mm) thick. It weighs 173 oz (173 g).
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.2 inches (168.6 mm) in length, 0.1 inches (78 mm) in width, and 0.1 inches (9.8 mm) in thickness. Vivo X50 is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Vivo X50 is bigger than ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S, which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, vivo X50 is more compact than ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 218 oz (45 g). The vivo X50 is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of holding it in one hand | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 7/100 | 37/100 |
| Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
Display of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2340, and the pixel density is 387 ppi. The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S has a 6.65 inch screen size.
Display of the vivo X50
The vivo X50 uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2376, and the pixel density is 397 ppi. The vivo X50 has a 6.56 inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.09 inch difference in the display sizes. Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose. Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 81/100 | 80/100 |
| How suited is the screen to play games on? | 86/100 | 85/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
Camera performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
The main camera of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S has 64 MP. The front camera has 8 MP.
Camera performance of vivo X50
The main camera of the vivo X50 has 48 MP. The front camera has 32 MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 16 MP difference in comparison. Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 24 MP difference in front camera pixel number. The vivo X50's front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The vivo X50 has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The vivo X50's front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 100/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
The processing capability of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). The memory capacity is 16GB.
The processing capability of the vivo X50
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the vivo X50 uses the Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore). The memory capacity is 8GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
This is a 8GB difference in memory capacity.
Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 100/100 | 97/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
Battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S has a battery capacity of 4500 mAh.
Battery performance of vivo X50
The vivo X50 has a battery capacity of 4200 mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300 mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50
The storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S has 256GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the vivo X50
The vivo X50 has 256GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
Both the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and the vivo X50 can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 90/100 |
| Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | - |
Which to buy, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S or vivo X50
At the end of the day which is better, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S or vivo X50?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact vivo X50 is a great choice.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Handling | 42/100 | 55/100 |
| Display | 80/100 | 81/100 |
| CPU specs | 100/100 | 98/100 |
| General rating | 81/100 | 85/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X50, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the vivo X50 is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the vivo X50 is a high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S andvivo X50?
A summary of the technical specifications of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S and vivo X50. Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 5S | vivo X50 | |
| | |
| Color | Silver/Blue+Red | Black/Blue/Pink |
| OS | Android | Android |
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm) | 3.0 inches (75.4 mm) x 6.3 inches (159.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.5 mm) |
| Weight | 218 oz (218 g) | 173 oz (173 g) |
| Display size | 6.65 inch | 6.56 inch |
| Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2376 |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 397 ppi |
| Battery capacity | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G |
| CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) |
| RAM size | 16GB | 8GB |
| Storage size | 256GB | 256GB |
| Rear-camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | 32 MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |
