Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB vs vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Created date: 2020-07-30 17:05:53, Updated date: 2022-06-24 18:24:18

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GBvivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GBvivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

How are the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GBvivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image4.1
81/100
Performancerating-image5.0
99/100
rating-image5.0
99/100
Storage sizerating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image5.0
100/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image5.0
100/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image5.0
100/100

What is the difference between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

The design of Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" is 168.7mm long, 77.3mm wide, and 10.4mm thick. It weighs 222.0g.

The design of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is 158.5mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 181.5g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 10.1mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 2.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is more compact than "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 40.5g. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Ease of holding it in one hand55/10069/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand4/10031/100
Ease of carrying around55/10062/100

Compare the display of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

Display of the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 394ppi. The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" has a 6.67inch screen size.

Display of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2376, and the pixel density is 397ppi. The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a 6.56inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.11inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?81/10080/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?86/10085/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

Camera performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

The main camera of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.

Camera performance of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

The main camera of the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has 50.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 14MP difference in comparison. There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 12MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/100100/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

The processing capability of the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

The processing capability of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 12.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" equally. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is basically no difference between "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/100100/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games99/10099/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

Battery performance of Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4729.0mAh.

Battery performance of vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4315.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 414mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB". Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

The storage capacity of the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

The "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

The "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" or "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10090/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - -

Which to buy, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" or "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" or "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB". There isn't much difference between "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB

vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB

Handling42/10056/100
Display81/10081/100
CPU specs99/10099/100
General rating83/10086/100

Is it recommended to buy the Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GB" and "vivo X50 Pro+ 256GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GBvivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
Xiaomi Black Shark 3S 256GBvivo X50 Pro+ 256GB
ColorSky Cloud Black/Crystal BlueBlue/Brown
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.3mm x 168.7mm x 10.4mm72.8mm x 158.5mm x 8.0mm
Weight222.0g181.5g
Display size6.67inch6.56inch
Display typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 24001080 x 2376
Pixel density394ppi397ppi
Battery capacity4729.0mAh4315.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5GQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865
CPU specs2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB12.0GB
Storage size256.0GB256.0GB
Rear-camera resolution64.0MP50.0MP
Front-camera resolution20.0MP32.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles