Which one is better, the Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB or vivo S7 (2020) 256GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-08-02 15:14:37, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:35:02
How are the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 78.9/100 (The 3068th of all smartphones) | 55.4/100 (The 463th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 57/100 | 62/100 | ||
Screen quality | 81/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 98/100 | 53/100 | ||
Storage size | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 100/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
The design of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is 158.8mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.
The design of Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" is 143.0mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 148.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 15.8mm in length, 2.2mm in width, and 1.2mm in thickness. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 22g. The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 69/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 39/100 | 55/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
Display of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 408ppi. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a 6.44inch screen size.
Display of the Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.44inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 44.0MP.
Camera performance of Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 51MP difference in comparison. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 36MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735CP SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB". The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" than the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 42/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" over the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB
The "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". Its perfect screen size of 6.44inch makes the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 62/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 53/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Coolpad Conjr (2017) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Gradient Blue | Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.2mm x 158.8mm x 7.4mm | 72.0mm x 143.0mm x 8.7mm |
Weight | 170.0g | 148.0g |
Display size | 6.44inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 408ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Mediatek MT6735CP |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 44.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |