Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo S7 (2020) 256GB vs Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Created date: 2020-08-02 15:23:11, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:28:34

vivo S7 (2020) 256GBCoolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB
vivo S7 (2020) 256GBCoolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB".

vivo S7 (2020) 256GBCoolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
74.2mm x 158.8mm x 7.4mm
rating-image2.7
77.0mm x 152.0mm x 9.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image4.1
AMOLED, 6.44inch, 1080 x 2400
rating-image3.7
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image4.9
Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G, 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 8.0GB
rating-image3.7
Mediatek MT6753, 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image4.5
256.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image5.0
4000.0mAh
rating-image4.4
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
64.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
44.0MP
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

The design of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is 158.8mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.

The design of Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

The "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" is 152.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 9.0mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 6.8mm in length, 2.7mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is bigger than "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 2g. There is very little difference in weight between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand67/10058/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10040/100
Ease of carrying around61/10057/100

Compare the display of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

Display of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 408ppi. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a 6.44inch screen size.

Display of the Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

The "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.94inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

Camera performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

The main camera of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 44.0MP.

Camera performance of Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

The main camera of the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 51MP difference in comparison. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 39MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?100/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

The processing capability of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.

The processing capability of the Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB". Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" than the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB". The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet100/10082/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games97/10066/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

Battery performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

The "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" over the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB". Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10087/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10074/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

The "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 240GB. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 67/100

Which to buy, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB". If you want a larger screen, "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is recommended as it has a 6.44inch screen. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GB

Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB

Handling57/10053/100
Display81/10074/100
CPU specs98/10073/100
General rating86/10067/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo S7 (2020) 256GBCoolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB
vivo S7 (2020) 256GBCoolpad Note 3 Plus 16GB
ColorBlack/White/Gradient BlueChampagne Gold/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.2mm x 158.8mm x 7.4mm77.0mm x 152.0mm x 9.0mm
Weight170.0g168.0g
Display size6.44inch5.5inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 24001080 x 1920
Pixel density408ppi400ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5GMediatek MT6753
CPU specs2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB3.0GB
Storage size256.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution64.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution44.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles