Vivo S7 (2020) 256GB vs Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2020-08-02 14:06:36, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:36:50
How are the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
The design of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is 158.8mm long, 74.2mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.
The design of Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" is 141.9mm long, 69.9mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.9mm in length, 4.2mm in width, and 0.9mm in thickness. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" is bigger than "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 32g. The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 39/100 | 63/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
Display of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2400, and the pixel density is 408ppi. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a 6.44inch screen size.
Display of the Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.44inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB". The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 79/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 83/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 64.0MP. The front camera has 44.0MP.
Camera performance of Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 51MP difference in comparison. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 39MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB". Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" than the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB". The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 53/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 980mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" slightly more. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 93/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 84/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB
The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB
The "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" or "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB"?
"Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 6.44inch makes the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB", the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 67/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 66/100 |
General rating | 86/100 | 69/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo S7 (2020) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo S7 (2020) 256GB" and "Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo S7 (2020) 256GB | Meizu M3s (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Black/White/Gradient Blue | Silver/Gray/Pink/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.2mm x 158.8mm x 7.4mm | 69.9mm x 141.9mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 170.0g | 138.0g |
Display size | 6.44inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2400 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 408ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3020.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 64.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 44.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |