Which one is better, the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB or vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2020-08-05 19:34:43, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:48:01
How are the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
The design of vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is 159.5mm long, 75.4mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 174.5g.
The design of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is 151.7mm long, 75.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7.8mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 0.5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 64/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 36/100 | 36/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
Display of the vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2376, and the pixel density is 397ppi. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has a 6.56inch screen size.
Display of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 534ppi. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.05inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 80/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 85/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
Camera performance of vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
The main camera of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has 48.0MP. The front camera has 32.0MP.
Camera performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 20.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 28MP difference in comparison. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 24MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 100/100 | 90/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" uses the Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G SoC. The CPU performance is 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 8.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB", the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 4GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB". The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" than the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 97/100 | 60/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
Battery performance of vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has a battery capacity of 4200.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3250.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 950mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" over the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 81/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB
The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 192GB. "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 84/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | - | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". The "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" overall, "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 55/100 | 55/100 |
Display | 81/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 98/100 | 67/100 |
General rating | 85/100 | 76/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X50 5G (2020) 256GB | ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB | |
Color | Glaze Black/Frost Blue/Pink | Ion Gold/Quartz Grey/Chromium Silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 75.4mm x 159.5mm x 7.6mm | 75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 174.5g | 175.0g |
Display size | 6.56inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2376 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 397ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 4200.0mAh | 3250.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 48.0MP | 20.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 32.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |